My question remains the same. It's the question I asked originally, but still haven't heard an answer. In viewing of some of these amendments, I find many similar to this that I would consider to be out of scope. Am I wrong when I say that if you had this bill before committee before second reading, you could make substantive changes from a procedural standpoint?
I know the NDP has asked before for bills on other issues to be sent to committee before second reading for the very reason that they can actually rewrite the bill. When it comes to committee after second reading, that's not what you're supposed to be doing. I'd like an opinion. Am I wrong here? If I am, I will stand corrected.