Just to conclude then, Chair, if that was your comment, that's fine, but I again point out the fact that this should be considered out of order only because it substantively changes the bill. That's not what we are here to do. We received this bill after second reading. This bill passed second reading in the House. Now the very core of this bill is being gutted, quite frankly, if this amendment passes. That's just not consistent with the procedures and practices of the House.
On December 6th, 2007. See this statement in context.