I think that's a good question, and that's the way we're looking at it.
I hope the committee is not looking at this through a straw. This is a very specific amendment, yes, but for us it's very hard to talk about improving the proof of residence without talking about vouching procedures. This amendment will do nothing for students who move away to go to school, most of whose identification is probably at their parents' address but they want to vote in the city in which they are attending school. There's nothing in this amendment that will improve that situation. They won't have sufficient proof of residence. And things get worse if you're in a university residence, where previously residence dons would be able to vouch for everybody on their floor. As a proof of residence, that's no longer possible.
But I think you're right. I've seen virtually no evidence, either this fall or last spring, that voter fraud is something that's being properly dealt with.