Very well.
I have a question now for you, Mr. Paquette.
Ms. Robillard is quite correct. With all due respect for the members of the subcommittee, it seems to me that they acted arbitrarily and erred in their interpretation as to the bill's “votability”, by invoking various constitutional instruments, that is, the two charters, the 1867 and 1982 Constitution Act and the charter.
Obviously, given the arguments in Ms. Picard's letter—and I would like to hear what you have to say on that, Mr. Paquette, since you started to speak of it earlier—there is nothing in the two Constitution acts or the charter that prevents this bill from being votable.
Is that right?