As I said, I have sympathy for Monsieur Godin's position and Monsieur Proulx's position. From a procedural standpoint, I'm wondering, if we were to follow what Monsieur Godin is suggesting, Monsieur Proulx is suggesting, and we want to hear from a witness or the law clerk, would we then, procedurally, have to make a motion?
Right now all we can do is vote up or down the report. To do what I think both Monsieur Proulx and Monsieur Godin are suggesting, would that, from a procedural standpoint, mean that we have to entertain a motion and vote on a motion to bring in witnesses?