I didn't have the chance, because you interrupted me.
My point of order was simply that I don't actually understand what the ruling is and what the question is you're calling.
Are you calling the question on Madam Redman's motion, or are you calling the question on whether to proceed to the motion that she has just proposed, as opposed to moving to what I think is--if you follow--a debatable question, which she's put forward? Separate from that, there is a question of whether or not the committee wants to move from the letter that caused us to come here to a specific way of putting the question that we will now debate. To me those are two separate things. I'm not sure which of the two you're actually proposing to us.
As a final note, I just want to remind you that just because Marlene Jennings says that you have to rule on things doesn't mean you actually have to rule on them. She doesn't actually make the rules in this House, much as she might want to.