Okay. I see that as a point of clarification that's justified.
Here's how we started out the meeting. This meeting was called...and I'll read it exactly so members can understand:
Pursuant to Standing Order 106(4) meeting requested by four...members of the Committee to discuss their request to consider the Second Report of the Subcommittee on Agenda and Procedure.
Herein, I believe, lies the confusion. I was hoping to get a motion for this so that we could discuss the request to consider. I think that's where Mr. Reid is probably confused. I asked Madam Redman to move that motion. Madam Redman moved a slightly different motion, which moves us one step further, and that is that we consider the second report of the subcommittee. That motion, which is slightly different from what I was expecting, is actually a superseding motion and actually is legal and allowed, and the question must be put.
So I think we're all understanding it the same way, but we're just on different levels.
Here we are right now, where Madam Redman has moved a motion that we go to discussing the second report now. That's a legal motion. It's superseding. It has to be answered now.