I really need some clarification. Last week when Madam Redman moved a motion, my understanding was that it was a superseding motion--that was your definition--and therefore the debate immediately went to her motion. At some point, while debate on her motion was going on, the meeting was adjourned--and if I'm misstating something, I would appreciate a correction. Therefore, when we came back, the business should have been Ms. Redman's motion that was being debated, which I had understood was a superseding motion. It could not be amended and could only be debated. I had moved the question--
On February 14th, 2008. See this statement in context.