Not anymore. I'm really sorry to say that the sweater vest crowd gets into the bars without showing photo ID. It just happens that way.
During the summer, Monsieur Mayrand, the Chief Electoral Officer of this country, certainly tried to share with us why he's interpreting it that way. This committee unanimously asked him not to share it that way. I was even quoted during the summer, asking what part of photo ID doesn't he understand? The actual photo piece is the important piece. You look at the photo and you compare it to something. That's why we use photo ID as a comparison.
So we've asked to get that cleaned up. We've been charged, as a committee, to move forward on that piece of legislation, Bill C-6. It would be nice to get it done. If I can commend my colleagues, there's certainly been a lot of legislation that's gone through the House here in the last little while, and that's been great. Certainly some of us voted with it, some of us voted against it, and others were sitting on their hands, not actually earning their paycheques.
The legislation continues to flow through other committees, whether it's the justice committee, where we had the Tackling Violent Crime Act go through last week. It was great to see it get royal assent. It was fantastic, but here we are, not wanting to do that in this committee. I'm still at a bit of a loss, Chair, as to how and why we got to this in this committee and aren't moving the same way as other committees. This used to be the committee that actually showed common sense. We used to show common sense.