I was listening to Ms. Jennings, and it's possible I've misunderstood. I saw her writing it out, and then she talked about it. She was using a version of the agenda with a wording that is not quite Mr. Lukiwski's.
It had been my impression that what she put down could not, the way she worded it, have had the effect of removing the words “at its next meeting”.
Perhaps I'm mistaken, and if that's the case, then the point of order I've raised would be incorrect. So I'll have to wait for you to tell me what the actual wording was. That would settle the dispute.
I'm not disputing her ability to do a motion like this. I'm just saying that as it's worded it would be a problem. But if I've misunderstood, then it isn't a problem.
If I've understood correctly and it is a problem, she can always reintroduce it. I certainly would not be the one to stop her from doing so in a wording that's correct.