Any further comments on the point?
Colleagues, here's sort of a decision from me. The chair doesn't actually have to give the reasons for his ruling. So whether I identify one problem with the amendment or three, my ruling would have still been that it is out of order and would have been overturned.
My decision is that we are on the debate of the amendment at this point.
I'm sorry, Mr. Lukiwski, but you were on the list for the motion. We're now on the amendment.
Mr. Preston, please, on the amendment.