No, the $34 million would cover what I call recurrent costs. In other words, the $34 million would basically be used to pay electoral workers.
On November 15th, 2007. See this statement in context.
On November 15th, 2007. See this statement in context.
November 15th, 2007 / 12:20 p.m.
Chief Electoral Officer, Office of the Chief Electoral Officer
No, the $34 million would cover what I call recurrent costs. In other words, the $34 million would basically be used to pay electoral workers.
See context to find out what was said next.