I'm sorry, I wasn't sure if you were consulting with some notes for further comment.
I was looking at some of what Professor Blais talked about, and it does seem to me that there is one area where.... I want to be cautious in saying that I dispute his findings, because I have great respect for the professor and his work, but he makes a comparison between 2004 and 2006 and attempts, based on some kind of numerical measure, to say that there is an increase in voter turnout at advance polls. Looking at those two results, and the results in the same ridings on how many additional votes in total were cast, we can come up with the metric that says for every additional vote cast in 2006 at advance polls, in a riding-by-riding comparison, we see a 0.56% increase in total voter turnout. While it's an interesting number, I do think it is, frankly, a bit of a non sequitur here, and I guess I'm throwing it out just so people are aware of my concern. This is, I think, fundamentally different from the idea of an advance voting day where polls are available everywhere. I'm just not sure this particular metric can be applied to that future hypothetical situation and produce the same kind of overall result.
I don't know if you would agree with me that the application of that to a future hypothetical situation might not produce the precise outcome he's suggesting.