My comment is on calculating the incremental cost of this initiative. I guess I would caution against simply saying that the way to do that is to take the $34 million estimated cost and divide that by the likely increase in the number of people participating through advance polling.
I think a more reasonable way of calculating the incremental cost is to look at the cost of advance polling overall and then ask the question as to whether advance polling is worth the cost, given the number of people who take advantage of advance polling, and then have a discussion about how best to implement the advance polling initiative.