Obviously, under that, you don't. I gather that this committee debated previously the notion of national voter registration cards, which came out, I believe, in the discussions in the report that went into the recommendations that led to Bill C-31, and using that kind of approach was rejected. So short of a national voting card with identification, you have to deal with the fact that many Canadians don't have photo ID. That's why the current regime was chosen.
What I can tell you, however, is that when somebody does show their face at a polling station, if they then come to vote again half an hour later, because they have shown their face--even if they have someone else's identification--it will be possible for the scrutineers, the election officials working at that polling station, to notice that it's the same person again trying to vote fraudulently using someone else's identification.
When you're talking about maintaining the integrity of the electoral process to prevent voter fraud, even without photo identification, even when other pieces of identification are used, you have a positive and salutary effect on enhancing the integrity of the electoral process. That's what this is all about, fundamentally.
The two bills we're dealing with today are both building on Bill C-31. They're dealing with unanticipated consequences or interpretations that came out of Bill C-31. In that sense, if we're looking for our original intent, which comes from Bill C-31, to increase the integrity of the voter process, to reduce voter fraud, this will go some distance to advancing that.