Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Mr. Mayrand, I have three questions. I would like first of all to understand something. Mr. Lukiwski made some statements and in my view there is something that does not click.
First of all, Mr. Lukiwski stated that each party had returning officers at the voting tables. He used the term scrutineers. Unless some changes were made last night while I was sleeping, that is not quite the way it works. The party with the best result has one, the party with the second best result can put forward a suggestion as to the second one, but there is not one scrutineer per party. Of course, parties or candidates can have representatives, but there is not, automatically, one scrutineer for each party. Mr. Lukiwski therefore mislead Canadians with what he said.
Secondly, Mr. Lukiwski talked about voting cards. Once again, he mislead Canadians because the postcard or card one receives at home does not entitle one to vote. It informs the person that there will be elections and tells the addressee where to go and vote, is that not the case? That is not what is called a voting card.