Evidence of meeting #1 for Procedure and House Affairs in the 40th Parliament, 2nd Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was report.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Clerk of the Committee  Mr. James M. Latimer

11:25 a.m.

The Clerk

Mr. Chair, through you to the committee, once the report has been concurred in by the House, as long as 48 hours' notice--or two sleeps--have been given for organization meetings, the other committees may organize. So if the House were to concur in the report today, the earliest that other committees could begin meeting, according to the Standing Orders, would be Thursday.

11:25 a.m.

NDP

Yvon Godin NDP Acadie—Bathurst, NB

I understand, but all parties must agree in order for a committee to sit. We cannot hold meetings on our own.

11:25 a.m.

The Clerk

The House, Mr. Chair, would have to concur in the report that you've presented to the House. At that point the membership becomes official. According to the standing order, the Clerk of the House will convene a meeting, giving at least 48 hours' notice, for the purpose of electing a chair.

11:25 a.m.

Liberal

Marcel Proulx Liberal Hull—Aylmer, QC

For any or all committees?

11:25 a.m.

The Clerk

It doesn't say all; within ten sitting days of the adoption of the report in the House, the committees must meet to elect a chair. The earliest they could begin meeting, if the report is concurred in today, would be Thursday.

11:25 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Joe Preston

Is any further clarification needed on that? We're okay with that?

Going back to Mr. Reid's motion of accepting the routine motions for this committee, did I have a seconder for that?

11:25 a.m.

The Clerk

You don't need a seconder for that.

(Motion agreed to [See Minutes of Proceedings])

11:25 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Joe Preston

On future business, I'll go with Michel and then Tom.

11:25 a.m.

Bloc

Michel Guimond Bloc Montmorency—Charlevoix—Haute-Côte-Nord, QC

I haven't confirmed this with my colleagues from the other parties, but during the brief period of time that we sat in late November and early December, we agreed to move forward with certain items of business, in particular the question of forms and the creation of a subcommittee on gifts in conjunction with the work of the ethics commissioner.

According to the notes prepared for us by the Library of Parliament, technically, we would need to approve these decisions once again. Could we move a general motion calling on the committee to endorse the decisions made during meetings held in late November and early December, even it we have to specify the exact dates? A few weeks ago, we agreed to set up a subcommittee on gifts and we agreed on the form. Do you really want to go over all of this again?

11:25 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Joe Preston

Is there any discussion on that?

11:25 a.m.

Conservative

Scott Reid Conservative Lanark—Frontenac—Lennox and Addington, ON

I think procedurally it might make sense to handle the two things as two separate motions, one to deal with the forms and one to deal with the subcommittee, I would suggest.

11:25 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Joe Preston

I know it would make Madam Dawson pretty happy.

Mr. Lukiwski.

11:25 a.m.

Conservative

Tom Lukiwski Conservative Regina—Lumsden—Lake Centre, SK

I was just going to make a suggestion. Since at our last sitting we had, as a committee, approved the report by Madam Dawson, I was going to make a motion that we approve it again. It has nothing to do with the subcommittee on gifts. We did approve, as a committee, the report from Madam Dawson, so I would like to move that we approve that once more.

11:25 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Joe Preston

Monsieur Proulx.

11:30 a.m.

Liberal

Marcel Proulx Liberal Hull—Aylmer, QC

I was under the impression that what we had done, properly and legally, prior to the prorogation remained and stayed. But I'm informed that's not the case.

11:30 a.m.

Conservative

Tom Lukiwski Conservative Regina—Lumsden—Lake Centre, SK

No. We didn't report it to the House.

11:30 a.m.

Liberal

Marcel Proulx Liberal Hull—Aylmer, QC

So it didn't get reported to the House.

Okay. I was under the impression that we had.

11:30 a.m.

Conservative

Tom Lukiwski Conservative Regina—Lumsden—Lake Centre, SK

So maybe my motion should be that we approve the report and report it to the House.

11:30 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Joe Preston

Is there any further discussion?

Monsieur Godin.

11:30 a.m.

NDP

Yvon Godin NDP Acadie—Bathurst, NB

Mr. Chair, are we talking about the steering committee report? We are? One person is saying yes, and another is saying no.

11:30 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Joe Preston

It was a report. We accepted the report from Ms. Dawson on her use of the new disclosure statement forms, but we did not have time to report it to the House before prorogation, so it went away. We are asking if we can bring it back and report it to the House.

11:30 a.m.

NDP

Yvon Godin NDP Acadie—Bathurst, NB

Only that item?

11:30 a.m.

Bloc

Michel Guimond Bloc Montmorency—Charlevoix—Haute-Côte-Nord, QC

And the matter of creating a subcommittee on gifts.

11:30 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Joe Preston

I've heard that we're asking to do those as two separate things. So let's do them that way if possible. Let's talk about the report from Ms. Dawson first and the acceptance of the disclosure forms. She'll be quite pleased if we get that through and reported to the House so she can use the forms.

Is there further discussion on that motion?

All in favour of accepting the report on the draft disclosure forms and reporting it to the House?

(Motion agreed to)

11:30 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Joe Preston

Mr. Guimond.