Thank you, Mr. Chair.
Thank you, Madam Dawson, for appearing today.
I notice in your report, at the top of page 2, that you comment on some of the significant changes we've made as a committee. As you point out, the changes were approved by the House of Commons in June. There was a change in the approved forms, which this committee approved. I think those were significant improvements.
But then I go back to the fourth-last paragraph of the first page of your comments today. You point out that a significant amount of the work of your advisors is taken up reviewing the complex aspects of some of the situations that come before you where, as you say, “the application of the Code is not immediately apparent”.
I think that raises the question, in my mind at least...and I know we'll never be able to have a code that is so iron-clad that it will cover every single possible eventuality. I understand that. But does this reflect possibly the need on the part of this committee to schedule a periodic automatic review mechanism to address some of the things that possibly could be lumped together in a code, which would free up some of the advisors' time from going into all of the individual possible scenarios? Perhaps once every two years or so we'd have an automatic review and you would bring those to us.
How would you respond to that?