That would be one possibility.
This committee was very open last year to dealing with problems as they came up. We dealt with the gift issues, for example. They were quite a problem.
If you put a limit on there of every two years, it might not be frequent enough, in some cases. On the other hand, you have a mandatory five-year review as well, I believe, which has to happen whether or not we've had the little ones in between. So I'm not sure you'd be gaining by having a mandatory two-year review .
The other comment to make is that it's not that the provisions maybe are faulty. It's that each individual situation is different. Sometimes it's not clear just how that provision would apply to the particular situation. That's where the difficulty in interpreting comes.