The short answer is no, because there is an infinite series of scenarios there. Mostly it is cost displacement. There may be some additional costs because we will have recruited more people, let's say 10% or 20%, but basically these workers are paid strictly for the training in those cases, which is $35 per worker.
Again, in terms of costs associated with finding alternative sites and what the options are, right now we're not in a position to forecast all of those costs, given what we know about the situation.