With regard to the results in the referendum, in the first referendum, I think I'm right in saying that support was relatively evenly spread across ridings. I think there were very few ridings in which it was not approved, and they tended to mirror each other much more than one might have expected.
What about the second referendum? Was there more geographic distinction? The second referendum would have been in the context of people then knowing whether they were in a riding that was going to have just a couple of MLAs or one of these larger ridings that would have a larger number of MLAs.
I'm just trying to find out if that kind of thing had any impact on the riding-by-riding results. Was it more widely supported in rural areas than urban areas, or the reverse? I'm just throwing these out.