I don't have any experience with them whatsoever. I'm just not sure. If I were to consider them, I think I would have to do my homework on them. I don't know who you want educating the public. Do you want a bias, or do you want a non-biased group? I really don't know the answer because I've never been on the biased group. Having been in an unbiased position to deliver this, I've got to tell you that we got a lot of positive feedback on it—not that it wasn't a very big challenge. We had a lot of positive feedback because of the role.
The agency took a hit. That annoyed me afterwards a little bit, because we always do our polling, as I said, and I think we scored.... And I'm guessing at the numbers now. But in our thing we always ask, well, for Elections Ontario, if people see it as a non-biased organization, or if they see it as party-related, or whatever. In this one where we might have scored 90 before, we were running about 50-50 as a representative of the government, and we're not a representative of the government at all. We're an agency apart, the same as our budget's apart, and the CEO's appointment. It's very apart.
That muddied the waters; that annoyed me. Could it have been prevented? I don't think so. I don't think we went out there, but it was seen as our trying to take a mandate of the government and make it work. I don't know if that actually got people to vote against it or not. It could have; I don't know mindsets. I think it's worth investigating just because of the amount of feedback we got.