Mr. Blanchet, you said that the best thing would be for a national Referendum Act to be included in the Canada Elections Act, to ensure oversight of financial limits, good governance of campaign finances in a referendum, so it could be strictly controlled, and so the sources of the money, where it came from, what happens, and so on, could be verified.
Allowing the provinces to hold national referendums seems to me to be very problematic because there would be 13 legislative frameworks involved. It's all very well to say that it would be allowed as long as the provincial or territorial legislation was more or less the same as the federal act, but Prince Edward Island, for example, has no control over finances. I know that is also the case in other jurisdictions. I can't see how that could be done.
As well, I find it hard to see how there could be two legislative frameworks to govern referendums: one that decides the question is not so important, so it can be held at the same time as an election campaign, and another that decides the question is so important that the two must not be combined. Whether we like it or not, if the only reason for having two legislative frameworks was that one of them decides that it is not too important and so a referendum can be held at the same time as an election, it would be politicized in any event.
Second, people who are not interested in the question also won't vote. We have seen the example of Ontario. In my opinion, a referendum should not be held at the same time as an election. If our only justification is to increase the turnout, we should find other ways of getting electors interested. If they are not interested, despite all our efforts, it is because the question really does not interest them.
I would like to know your reactions to my position.