Thank you very much, Chair.
I'll endorse my colleagues in welcoming you for the two hours that you're spending with us.
We've talked a lot about the problems we had in the last election. I agree with my colleagues that there were some horrendous problems--and we've talked about it privately--about confirming the identity of the people, especially the elderly people, in my riding. I think I might have a partial solution, if we can talk about solutions for a bit.
My riding is made up of a city of about 45,000 people and a rural area of five or six municipalities of probably 3,000 or 4,000 people each. It really works well in the city of 45,000 because there's an election office there where anybody can go in and vote at any time. There's no excuse for not voting, because you can go there 12 hours a day, I think it is, for 35 days. I wonder if it wouldn't be effective and economical if we were to have a one-person or two-person office out in those little municipalities for the same time. They would accommodate the people in that area.
What happens in my case—it's about an hour's drive at the furthest point—is that if the person happens to be going into the larger community for whatever reason, to see the doctor or something, they'll take advantage of the chance to vote, but other than that, they're not going to make the special trip into the larger community to vote. However, if they were just going down the street, they would.
I think that's money you would save. If you can get the people to spread out the vote, it makes your life a heck of a lot easier on election day. Anyway, it's something I think you'd want to think about. In the major cities I don't think it's an issue, because in every riding you probably have Elections Canada offices within a few miles.
The other thing is something that my CFO has asked me to bring to your attention. I think I lost a friend over this last election, because my CFO is a chartered accountant, with 35 years of experience in the business, and he's never seen anything like the report that he's required to file with Elections Canada now. This is his second time around, and that's why I think I've lost a friend for sure. He agreed, but I had to convince him to do it. On the report he has to complete, the software, he says—and I don't know, because I don't understand it—is the most unfriendly software that he's ever seen anywhere. I really think that maybe you should communicate; you do have a list of the CFOs, I'm sure.