Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Mr. Mayrand, I would like to speak to you about accessibility for people with reduced mobility, disabled people or people who are walking with a cane or using a three-wheel scooter to get around. Many polling stations were not accessible to these people. I have the following question.
When a returning officer chooses a polling station, is the choice of a site that is accessible an essential, important and unavoidable criterion? If the premises are not accessible, are there any additional funds available to the returning officer in order to install a temporary ramp, for example? In my riding, certain arrangements were made. Other polling stations were not accessible, and in general, my colleagues in the Bloc found that there was a lack of accessibility for people with reduced mobility.
This is a matter that is very close to my heart. These people are often confronted with public spaces that are inaccessible, but when the time comes to exercise your right as a citizen to vote, in my opinion there should be no exceptions. We must make all polling stations accessible.
My second question is the following: You said earlier on that it was not within the scope of your mandate to recommend changes to legislation other than the Canada Elections Act. For example, Mr. Godin explained to you that in ridings where there is a great deal of availability in the labour force because of the crisis in the manufacturing sector, many people on EI and other unemployed people would be ready to work. However, trading four quarters for a dollar, if I may use that expression, does not interest them and with good reason. Their benefits are reduced.
Under the Employment Insurance Act, their income is taken into account but not their contribution at work. If I work for 12 hours, the legislation does not recognize my contribution. They are not recognized as insurable hours. In this way some people can find themselves short a few hours. In my riding, there are two Elections Canada workers who were short five hours in order to be eligible for employment insurance.
You may not be aware of this, Mr. Mayrand but only 50% of the people who pay premiums are eligible for employment insurance, because it is a very restrictive program. Every hour counts. I wondered if this could be one of your recommendations. Since the income is taken into account in clawing back social assistance or employment insurance, could you recommend that, if you were to raise the salary of Elections Canada workers, those hours be insurable, so that they could count towards employment insurance along with the other hours worked by these same people?
My final question concerns the training given to returning officers. There are many new returning officers. This was true in my riding, and half of the staff were new as well. Do brand new returning officers receive any particular or additional support? Inexperienced returning officers caused a lot of problems in some ridings, as well as the fact that they were surrounded by new staff. We often had to provide them with information on election legislation in Canada, as to how it works, etc. Is there any specific training intended for staff at polling stations where practically everyone is new at every level, whether it be for the returning officer or the staff he has at a polling station?