I think one of the questions in terms of using it for electoral purposes, as some of our colleagues have said, is that we are elected on the fact that we represent our people and we're seen as fighters for our people, and if we're going to go back and be elected, we have to show that we actually stood up and spoke up. I think it's fair use to use what we've done in the House because we're saying to people this is what we did.
The question, though, and it's a discussion that I think is very fair, is about using other people's image to try to defeat them in an election. There is a notion of artistic right, where an artist can stop the use of a work because it denigrates their art, denigrates their image. Would we apply that notion to bring it to the procedure and House affairs committee if a member makes a challenge? He or she would make a challenge based on “they took my image, misused it, and are using it to try to have me defeated”. Would it come to you as a copyright infringement, or would it come to this committee to establish whether or not that was again going beyond the realm of fair use?