We are not driven by any personal rights of the member. We are driven by the rights of the institution in terms of copyright or privilege. So if a person has a defamatory claim by virtue of what's done, that's for the individual member to see to advance through the courts. We only act for the institution, and indirectly, obviously, for members where the institution is made to look bad—
On February 26th, 2009. See this statement in context.