Thank you, Chair.
Thank you, Mr. Walsh. It's always stimulating to have you at the end of the table.
If I'm getting this right, we could go to a full-blown constitutional amendment, the usual unexpected unanimity practically, and go through the whole of that, or we could do separate legislation, but not necessarily a constitutional amendment. Or we can do Standing Orders changes, which would not have the effect of prohibiting but would give the House follow-up actions.
Is there anything I'm missing? Is there a piece I'm leaving out?