As Mr. Proulx said, there can be consequences when prorogation is used. You can say that if you use prorogation, these are the consequences you will have to assume, but these consequences come after the prorogation. If you want to limit prorogation before it is done, limit the power itself. But no one can be certain.
You said right at the beginning, if I understood you well, that many experts agree this is protected under paragraph 41(a) of the Constitution Act, 1982, “the office of the Queen, the Governor General and the Lieutenant Governor”. I'm still talking about the power to prorogue.
If it is true that many experts agree it's protected under paragraph 41(a), then it means it's provided for in the Constitution. If it's in the Constitution, where is it exactly? If it is in the Constitution, where does that power begin and where does it end? That's the question I raise before this committee.
I personally think it has an implicit constitutional protection. If that is true, how can Parliament limit the Constitution of Canada? That's the main question. If it can do so, to what extent can it do so?