It's hard to say. I did not study all this at length. I would say that if Parliament itself speaks, it might be feasible to have some limits on the power to introduce bills. This has to be studied, because in the Constitution Act, 1867, there is a provision that says different kinds of bills can only be proposed by the government itself. There could be an argument that this provision protects the right to submit bills. If this is the case, if you limit that right, then you go against the Constitution. That all has to be studied very carefully.
My message today is this. Contrary to many Canadian citizens who would like to see a ban on prorogations and to have the current government pay the price for the practice that has existed for years in this country, I say be very careful. Don't go too far in banning or limiting the power to prorogue, but at the same time try to find some way to restore the authority of Parliament vis-à-vis that of the government. If bringing some limitations to the power to prorogue is a way to restore the authority of Parliament vis-à-vis the government, then it has to be studied, and it must be studied with an open mind. That's my view.