All the discussion about prorogation in a highly disciplined party system is irrelevant when you've got a majority government, which is the majority of Canada's experience both federally and provincially.
Obviously, had there been a majority government, say, as of December 30, nobody could have argued on prorogation, “Well, this is being done in order to prevent committee hearings from taking place; it's something the government doesn't want to have too many hearings into, and those committee hearings have been shut down simply by the government ordering its members, who form the majority of that committee, not to call for a meeting.” That would have been the end of that.
Likewise, the prorogation that took place a year earlier would obviously not have occurred. The parties representing a minority in the Parliament could hardly have said, “We have a coalition that we would like to now replace the government.”
I actually am interested in your provincial experience, although that was a very brief government. I don't know if there were any prorogations.