The question I have here is really more conceptual. I think I'm probably going to ask the same question to Professor Franks.
Isn't the fundamental problem we have here, at a conceptual level, that we are trying to find a proper use for a tool that most of the time in our constitutional history has been used in an utterly different way under utterly different circumstances that simply aren't relevant to our current circumstances? Aren't we really struggling, then, not with the question of how to prevent prime ministerial dictatorship, which is going to occur anyway when you have a majority government, just as it does in every province, but rather we are trying to deal with how to make minority governments work better, but we haven't actually agreed on how minority governments ought to actually work?
I'll throw that question out to you, and you can answer it when you like.