Thank you.
I just want to make sure that I understand some of the suggestions you've made, both to Monsieur Guimond and to Mr. Christopherson.
The House could adopt a motion amending the Standing Orders, I assume, which would indicate that the House views prorogation without its consent as an obstruction to it conducting its normal business. A second motion--or it could be included in the same motion--would stipulate that it's not a matter of confidence. And/or another motion amending the Standing Orders would state, “That the House of Commons would approve a decision by the Governor General not to acquiesce to a Prime Minister's request for prorogation without consent of the House”. Either included in that, or in a separate motion, it would stipulate that it also would not be a matter of confidence.
Did I understand you correctly?