All right. I guess it leads to this question, because we're asking constitutional experts and scholars to come here and to perhaps give their advice, but more importantly, I think, to give their opinions. If you had the ultimate power to deal with the issues of prorogation, how would you deal with them?
For example, would you eliminate the ability to prorogue altogether, such as in New Zealand, or would you, through a combination of changes to the Standing Orders, legislative changes, or whatever, deal with prorogation in a manner that you think would satisfy both the will of Parliament but also the constitutional ability of a government to prorogue? What would you suggest if you had free rein to develop a set of protocols?