Okay.
Under the current government's rule, Parliament has been prorogued more often than in the past. The public and the media were left with the impression that the government did not want to face the House of Commons. So, prorogation was a way for the government to circumvent the problem, instead of holding a confidence vote.
You said that it was possible to determine that the Prime Minister enjoyed the confidence of the House. I am not so sure of this, but, at the same time, the public wasn't happy with the way the country was being governed, and there was some fallout. Besides, this is why we are in committee.
Do you think that this way of proceeding, that is, asking the Governor General to prorogue Parliament, was justified? We say we want to limit the Prime Minister's authority to seek prorogation, but we need to know what circumstances must be present in order for him to make this request.