Thank you, Ms. Dawson. My question is rather specific, since I did sit on the Subcommittee on Gifts.
On page 9 of your report, you mention that volunteer services have been removed from the definition of “benefit.” Unless I've misunderstood, you are suggesting that, had they not been removed, your analysis of the case involving the MP for Halton would have perhaps been different.
Could you explain to me how removing volunteer services has changed the analysis of the MP's case?