No. I examined a few elements of the code and of the act.
I'll go to English; it's easier for me.
I try to expose deficiencies in the code or the act, or problems in my.... I've taken the approach now of having observations as well as an analysis. I think that there are a lot of areas in which if members want to enhance the code or the act, they can. I've tried to shed light on areas that need further thought.
It's not up to me to make up the rules if it's not covered in the code or in the act, but I do try to expose where there are problems. In fact, when I had the discussion of the cheques in the cheques report, very shortly thereafter it was a practice that was discontinued. So it has its effect, but I can't read something into the act or the code that isn't there. I can point out what isn't covered.
I don't know what else to say. One of the big issues is what is a private interest? It's fairly narrowly circumscribed in the code at the moment.
You know, I'm commenting, I'm putting the light on things, but I can't find that there has been a contravention if there hasn't technically been a contravention. I feel that in those cases where I did not find a contravention, there wasn't one, technically, but I try to go on to say, for example, “But this is not a good practice, and perhaps there should be some amendments.”