Perhaps I can build on where you are, Chair.
I'm asking colleagues: I'm assuming that the other three caucuses are in the same boat as me--namely, given the nature of what we're dealing with here, this isn't just any old bill. Of course, that's not saying that any old bill isn't important. My point is that I'm going to need an opportunity in the process to go back to my caucus to give them a sense of where the issue is, what the dynamics of the committee are, and also to get their marching orders, quite frankly, in terms of where I'm going to be. I would think that might apply, given the nature of what we're looking at here, to everybody, whether it's Mr. Chong's suggestions, the referendum, or the electoral change.
All of that, at least for me, process-wise, Chair, will involve me at some point being able to go back to my caucus with the lay of the land, my recommendations, and asking for my marching orders. Then I come back here and engage others with hopefully the same mandate to make decisions, yes or no.
I guess I'm asking, as much as anything, Chair, are colleagues from other caucuses in the same boat? Is that a step they need to build into this too?