I alluded to that, but I want to be more precise. I appreciate the question.
When I wrote to Mr. Manning I told him it would cost $10 million extra. This is as opposed to $140 million, so there's a savings of $130 million if you hold a referendum at the same time as a general election.
My colleague who is in charge now may have slightly different numbers, because I'm talking about 1993, but in terms of proportion, it gives you a fair idea. The savings are humongous because the whole machinery is there already. You don't have to re-hire the people; you don't have to re-train. It's all done; it's all there. So it's a net additional cost and it's not a lot on a $300-million cost, or whatever it is now.