My understanding was that the committee was considering whether there should be referendums and elections under one statute. If there were to be a joint statute, one statute to cover all eventualities, I was elaborating on what the various scenarios would be like. That's what I was doing, because you can put all of the above under one statute. I was also saying that if you intend to do only constitutional referendums, you might not want to spend a lot of time doing one statute alone. You might want to have two statutes.
On October 26th, 2010. See this statement in context.