The other distinction, of course, in the U.K. is there's no assigned seating, so it makes it inherently difficult to look out and recognize the member from wherever. They have 500 or 600 members, or whatever it is over there, sitting more or less randomly. The ability to corral people is more difficult.
By the same token, I am a bit worried that we would be unsuccessful in our ability to “uncorral”, to free people from the party whips. It is, after all, an informal system that is imposed effectively by the consent of all. What I'm thinking of here is that I assume that due to an open system or a random system, as you've put it, we have to have some kind of ongoing respect for party proportionality. In theory, we in our party have the right to ask questions freely within our selection, but in practice the hand of the whip comes down and says you'll be asking a question on the following--