There are candidates who are names on ballots, who are staff people for members of Parliament or senators, who are running in what we call low-resource areas. For these people, they're a name on a ballot. They give the opportunity to the local people to vote for all the political options before them. They don't enter the riding. They don't expend. They don't make any expenditures or garner any revenues. That happens in dozens of ridings among a variety...I would look to some of the smaller parties for that very evidence.
One thing we're trying to suggest is that we agree with the chief because all of this stuff has to be verified by Elections Canada staff. There is important work to be done, and I don't think looking at a small party that is running a candidate's name on a ballot in an area of non-traditional strength is deserving of the amount of time it takes to review an audit.