Thank you, Chair. I won't take a lot of time.
Mr. Lavigne, your comments focused a bit on accountability. You had some concerns over regulation, and you seemed to imply that less regulation would allow more people into the system. I'm not trying to put words in your mouth, but that was the implication I drew from that. You said--and I'm paraphrasing here--that we shouldn't require an audit on candidates who receive less than 10%.
My question is on that. I'm not trying to stifle any participation in the political process, but there always has to be a measure of accountability. I am wondering if you could go a little further on that to let me know your thoughts. Surely you're not suggesting that any candidate who receives less than 10% should not be accountable or not have to provide audited statements.
Would you be looking at something of the nature that the CEO would be able to randomly select candidates? What were your thoughts there? Could you expand a bit further?