Thank you, Mr. Chair.
For the purpose of these interventions, certainly when I make them—and I'm assuming also when someone like Mr. Lukiwski makes them—it is to inform the committee and help us make our decisions. So the question is whether giving an example helps to clarify the purpose of such supply days and their manipulation, and all of those considerations. I personally found this to be highly relevant to my own understanding.
While I appreciate that Mr. Szabo may not be finding it relevant for his understanding, I think it is just a bit on the presumptuous side to assume that he has full cognizance of the thoughts that are going on in my own head, or indeed the minds of other members, and thereby to expect, through his telekinetic powers, to transmit it then to your mind, thereby imposing his will on the entire committee.
That just seems to me to be a complete misunderstanding of the relevant consideration in these matters. I do wish he'd express this differently. I'm sure if he'd given it more consideration, he would have done so.
Mr. Chair, he hasn't really made a point of order. Quite the contrary.