Let's go back to my thought here.
The idea that if I or any member can turn anything into a matter that then gets decided on by challenging the chair means that everything, absolutely everything, that we deal with is reduced effectively to a majority vote, notwithstanding the fact that there are a whole series of things that can't be decided by a majority vote.
This is a tactic that I've noticed Mr. Szabo trending toward. We saw it being done in the last Parliament repeatedly by Ms. Jennings when she was here. There is no basis in the rules of order to allow this sort of thing to occur.
I just want to stress that turning points of order, or pretended points of order, into this kind of means of imposing a tyranny of the majority is really not an appropriate thing to do. I think that we really need to concentrate....