I will adopt that suggestion, perhaps later, when we have met with the lobbyists and have more information. I think the idea is starting to take shape for me too.
Mr. Walsh, you said that
the employee operates under the employer member.
So that is a somewhat classic example of the idea of employer-employee responsibility. Do you make a distinction between an intentional act—Mr. Paquette stated the hypothesis and I would point out that it is purely hypothetical in my case as well—and a case where someone was simply negligent by not impressing it strongly enough on the employee? Is there a distinction between that possibility and telling an employee that as soon as they receive the report they should send it to a list of specific people?