Fair enough.
The committee was debating whether the scope should be institutional, limited, etc., and I don't think the scope, from what you're telling us, should be limited to anything. Yes, we are the master of our own destiny and we are the master of how this study should go. As we move along, I guess we can expand the scope so that we can ensure that these things probably don't happen. I guess we've also asked the analysts to tell us.... The analysts may be taking a long time to find it, but have you any idea whether other jurisdictions have had a similar experience and have had problems?