In the matter at hand, I believe the amount is somewhere around $550,000 for two elections. These are GST rebates that were received by the party.
I will just point out that Elections Canada has no objection to receiving the money for the benefit of the Receiver General. Our issue--and I think this is the issue that is in dispute before the courts--is how should the return be amended? I think that is where the central dispute is.
With respect to whether other parties would be subjected to the same approach, depending on the outcome from the court at the end, we would have to ask parties to disclose voluntarily which party is getting a GST rebate, for what period, and how much of that rebate accounts for electoral expenses that were reimbursed by Elections Canada.