Ah, I see. I guess congratulations are in order then.
Let's get back to the issue at hand here. And again, I'm having a lot of difficulty. I think Mr. Christopherson and Ms. DeBellefeuille have also expressed some amazement at some of the things you're saying, just from a common-sense perspective. I have to keep going back to that.
Please just educate me, then, because it doesn't make sense to me that when you read something that says draft document—and you said you thumbed through it and put it in your desk, but you did thumb through it to the point where you recognized it was a draft document—obviously, when you're thumbing through it, you must have gleaned something from the document, enough to alert you that this is to deal with a report from the Standing Committee on Finance. Am I wrong here? When you said you thumbed through the document, what information did you glean from that, and what made you think that it was innocuous, that it shouldn't need any closer examination, particularly, as David has said, since the words “peek” and “draft” and all this stuff are included in that? I'm trying to get my head around your thinking.