No, no, that's fine. A fair comment.
But because of that, if he was a trusted source or someone you had known, also you obviously knew where he worked; he worked for a member of Parliament who was a member of the finance committee and you took the time to print off an attachment from an e-mail that he sent to you. But you're still contending that even though you knew him, you knew him well, and he sent you an e-mail, you printed off the attachment, but you didn't read it at the time you received it and printed it off?